Blu-ray cost-benefit analysis for long-term data backup versus SSD/HDD
Key claims
- Blu-ray offers lowest cost-per-TB and longest retention for archival backup compared to SSDs and HDDs.
Volume over time
No hourly data yet.
Source threads (1)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /g/109296207 ↗ live · archive neutral developing 7 replies Blu-ray offers lowest cost-per-TB and longest retention for archival backup compared to SSDs and HDDs.
Related stories
- Project ideas for salvaged LTO-6 tape drive and 60 tapes 1 mentions · shared: ssd
- Rising costs of RAM and storage capacity in consumer devices 16 mentions · shared: hdd, ssd
- Lucky shucking of 7200RPM WD RED from 12TB external drive 1 mentions
- User destroys SSD by opening a 5-petabyte zip bomb on PC 1 mentions · shared: ssd
- Family seeks access to deceased father's BitLocker-encrypted SSD containing his writings 1 mentions · shared: ssd
- Buyer second-guessing 12TB backup drive capacity 1 mentions