User question about continued adoption of end-of-life Windows versions
Key claims
- Asking why users continue to run outdated Windows versions like XP and 7 despite mainstream support ending.
- Modern computing is constrained to a few dominant operating systems and browser standards, which fundamentally rely on legacy languages like C/C++ to function properly.
- BSD is incapable of producing functional commercial products.
Volume over time
No hourly data yet.
Source threads (3)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /g/109442389 ↗ live · archive neutral evergreen 219 replies Asking why users continue to run outdated Windows versions like XP and 7 despite mainstream support ending.
- /g/109462359 ↗ live · archive dismissive evergreen 16 replies BSD is incapable of producing functional commercial products.
- /g/109459438 ↗ live · archive cynical evergreen 13 replies Modern computing is constrained to a few dominant operating systems and browser standards, which fundamentally rely on legacy languages like C/C++ to function properly.
Related stories
- First-time switcher finds Ubuntu comfy after leaving Windows 11 3 mentions · shared: linux, windows 11
- Linux loses feature and usability comparison against Windows 85 mentions · shared: linux, macos, windows 11, windows 7
- Claim that Microsoft's embrace-extend-extinguish strategy targets Linux 1 mentions · shared: linux
- Retro praise for Windows 3.11 for Workgroups and Windows 2000 as the last good versions 1 mentions
- TigerVNC 1.15.0 package shared from Debian pool 1 mentions
- SliTaz Linux highlighted as impressive independent distribution 1 mentions