Claim that GrapheneOS bait posts imply its quality
Key claims
- Anon suggests constant bait posts against GrapheneOS indicate it is genuinely good enough to warrant targeted attacks.
Volume over time
Peak 1 mentions/hour · 1 hourly buckets
Source threads (1)
Every thread this story was extracted from, with live and archive links so the evidence is verifiable.
- /g/109588629 ↗ live · archive bullish evergreen 29 replies Anon suggests constant bait posts against GrapheneOS indicate it is genuinely good enough to warrant targeted attacks.
Related stories
- Privacy advocacy general thread: FOSS smartphone ROM alternatives to iOS and stock Android 25 mentions · shared: grapheneos
- Newcomer asks how to set up anonymous email as Tuta and Proton fail for throwaways 1 mentions
- Anon claims preference for Chinese backdoors over Israeli ones 1 mentions
- Request for Samsung engineering ROMs for SM-P613 1 mentions
- Discussion of whether anything fun remains to do with phones 1 mentions
- Claims of Apple backdoors in plaintext logs and Apple Silicon 1 mentions